Twitter Facebook Feed

Reasons Against Partial Birth Abortion

Exploring the many compelling reasons against partial birth abortion can involve dealing with information that is both disturbing and difficult to fully understand. Nevertheless, a full comprehension of what this controversial procedure entails is necessary before an honest evaluation can be attempted. In many cases, a woman who undergoes this procedure does not understand the dangers to her own body or what will happen to the unborn child that she is carrying. These types of abortions are now illegal in the United States thanks to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. When this legislation was under consideration, members of congress heard disturbing testimony from medical professionals on how these abortions are carried out. Such convincing testimony resulted in the first federal ban on this type of late term abortion. However, there are still many proponents of this practice that are seeking to find loopholes around the existing law. Those who disregard the many reasons against partial birth abortion reason that to limit abortions in any way takes away a woman's right to choose. For many, respect for human life far surpasses any imagined rights to kill an innocent and defenseless unborn child. But in spite of the mounting evidence against the kind of barbaric practice that partial birth abortion represents, the debate rages on.

For those who have come to understand what happens during this procedure, looking for additional reasons against partial birth abortion is not necessary. In order for the unborn child to be removed from the mother's body, the mother's cervix will need to be dilated through artificial means. Once this has been accomplished, the infant is drawn into the birth canal and the feet, torso and arms are then delivered. The infant's head will remain inside of the mother's body. Since the head is the largest part of the body, it is the most difficult to deliver. To solve this problem, the abortionist will insert a sharp object into the back of the unborn infant's head, forming a hole. A tube is then place in this opening. Using extremely powerful suction, the brain tissue of the living infant will be removed. This action will frequently cause the child's head to collapse and the now lifeless infant can be removed from the womb. In some cases, the abortionist may be forced to use forceps to crush the baby's skull. During this procedure the child is both alive and able to feel pain. Such graphic descriptions undoubtedly supply the most convincing reasons against partial birth abortion.

When the facts regarding this inhumane procedure are known, it is hard to imagine that anyone could argue with the many reasons against partial birth abortion. But the battle to uphold a federal ban against this gruesome practice continues to be fought. Prior to the federal ban, thirty states had passed legislation that made the practice illegal. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court struck down these laws, spawning a push toward federal legislation. But even this federal law is being fought in court. Those who disregard the many compelling reasons against partial birth abortion argue that there are occasions when this type of procedure is necessary. In reality, there is no evidence to support such assertions. Opponents of legal bans also claim that lawmakers who voted for the ban were guilty of determining medical treatment for women without sufficient understanding of the related medical issues. The truth would seem to be exactly the opposite of this assertion. The more that is understood about what happens to both the mother and the unborn child during this procedure, the stronger and more vocal the opposition to this practice becomes. The Bible clearly indicates that God forms human life within the mother's womb. "Thus saith the Lord, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself." (Isaiah 44:24)

There are a number of myths that are frequently circulated to counter reasons against partial birth abortion. Proponents of these abortions maintain that there are times when the procedure is medically necessary. This is a flat falsehood. When legal, a partial birth abortion was performed on women that were more than twenty weeks pregnant. These second and third trimester abortions are more complicated and potentially dangerous to the mother. As unfortunate as it may be, a woman who chooses to undergo a late term abortion has many options other than the partial birth approach. While none of these procedures can honestly be described as humane, they are certainly preferable to the outright butchery that this controversial practice represents. Additionally, these procedures may cause undo risk to the mother's health and future ability to bear children.

Another argument that is often presented to oppose the many reasons against partial birth abortion is the notion that this procedure is somehow safer than other abortive measures. Many medical professionals maintain that this approach is in fact the most dangerous to the woman and the most inhumane to the unborn child. A number of life threatening complications can occur during these abortions. Some of these risks can include infection, a ruptured uterus and an embolism of the amniotic fluid. In the case of a ruptured uterus, a woman could easily bleed to death in a matter of minutes. The forced dilation of the cervix that is involved in these procedures can have a profoundly negative impact on the woman's health. When all of these factors are considered, any reasonable justification for these procedures is hard to imagine.

0 коммент.:

Отправить комментарий